The determination is the work
ESR is widely treated as a form-filling exercise, and for entities that clearly do or clearly do not carry on a relevant activity, it is. The difficulty sits with everything in between.
The relevant activities are defined categories — distribution and service centre, headquarters, holding company, intellectual property, lease-finance, shipping, banking, insurance, investment fund management. The definitions do not map neatly onto how businesses describe themselves, and licence activity descriptions are a poor guide because they were chosen for licensing purposes rather than for this.
We see errors in both directions. Entities filing as though they carry on a relevant activity when they do not, creating an ongoing obligation and a substance requirement out of nothing. And entities carrying on one without realising, which is the more expensive error.
Which businesses this applies to
UAE entities, both mainland and free zone, that may carry on one of the defined relevant activities. Holding companies are the largest single population, because holding shares can constitute a relevant activity and holding companies are exactly the entities nobody reviews.
Group structures with an entity providing services to affiliates — potentially a distribution and service centre business or a headquarters business. Entities holding intellectual property, which attracts the most rigorous substance expectations. And any entity whose licence activity description touches one of the categories even loosely.
The work, step by step
What this looks like in practice:
- Assess relevant activity properly against the definitions and against what the entity actually does, not what its licence says.
- Document the conclusion either way. An entity that concludes it carries on no relevant activity should be able to show how it reached that, because the question will be asked again next year.
- File the notification within the required window for the reportable period.
- Identify the core income-generating activities for each relevant activity, since these determine what substance actually has to look like.
- Test the substance: directed and managed in the UAE, adequate people, adequate premises, adequate expenditure, CIGAs performed here.
- Gather evidence contemporaneously — board minutes, attendance records, employment contracts, lease agreements, expenditure records.
- Prepare and file the report where a relevant activity is carried on and income is earned from it.
- Address gaps, because a substance deficiency identified before the report is fixable and one identified after it is not.
What adequate substance actually requires
Substance is tested against the activity rather than against a fixed standard, so a holding company and an intellectual property business face very different expectations:
- Directed and managed in the UAE — board meetings physically held here, with directors present, minuted, and with genuine decisions taken rather than ratified
- Adequate employees — qualified people in the UAE, whether employed directly or through a properly documented outsourcing arrangement
- Adequate premises — proportionate to the activity, which for a holding company may be modest and for an operating business is not
- Adequate expenditure — incurred in the UAE, proportionate to the income earned
- CIGAs performed in the UAE — the specific income-generating activities defined for that relevant activity, not general oversight
Holding companies benefit from a reduced substance test, which is proportionate. Intellectual property businesses face the most demanding one, and a high-risk IP business faces a rebuttable presumption it has to actively displace.
The two errors, and why over-filing is not the safe option
Businesses reasonably assume that filing when in doubt is the cautious approach. It is not.
Filing as though you carry on a relevant activity creates an ongoing obligation, an expectation of substance you may not have, and a stated position that is difficult to reverse later without explanation. An entity that files a report it did not need to file has asserted something about itself, and next year it either files again or explains the change.
The opposite error — not filing when you should — carries penalties and, for entities relying on free zone status or a treaty position, potentially worse consequences.
The answer to both is the same: do the determination properly once, document it, and revisit it when the activity changes. Guessing in either direction creates a problem rather than avoiding one.
Common mistakes
The expensive mistakes in this area are consistent:
- Assessing relevant activity from the licence description rather than from what the entity actually does.
- Assuming holding companies are outside scope. They are the largest population that is inside it.
- Filing defensively when no relevant activity is carried on, which creates an obligation rather than avoiding one.
- Board meetings held by circulation or with directors joining from abroad, which does not evidence direction and management in the UAE.
- Substance evidence assembled at reporting time rather than gathered as it arises.
- Outsourcing arrangements with no documentation, so the substance relied on cannot be demonstrated.
- Treating last year’s determination as permanent when the activity has changed.
Deadlines that apply
The notification is due within the window for the reportable financial period, and the report follows for entities carrying on a relevant activity and earning income from it.
More usefully: the substance work has to happen during the period, not at filing. Board meetings cannot be held retrospectively, employment cannot be backdated, and expenditure cannot be relocated. An entity that reviews its position at the start of the period can fix a deficiency; one that reviews it at filing can only report it.
What lands on your desk
- A documented relevant activity determination for each entity
- Notification filed within the window
- CIGA analysis where a relevant activity is carried on
- A substance assessment against each element of the test
- A gap analysis with remediation actions, timed to be actionable
- The report prepared and filed where required
- A contemporaneous evidence file
What to have ready
The list is short and you will have most of it already:
- Trade licence and activity descriptions for every entity
- A description of what each entity actually does
- Financial statements showing income by activity
- Board composition, and details of where and how meetings are held
- Employment details: headcount, roles, location
- Premises: lease agreements and physical arrangements
- Details of any outsourcing arrangements, including to group entities
- Prior year ESR notifications and reports
How this is priced
The determination is a fixed fee per entity and is the part worth paying for — frequently the conclusion is that no relevant activity is carried on, which is a cheap and useful answer.
Notification and report filing are fixed fee. Substance remediation, where a gap is found, is quoted separately because it depends entirely on what is missing — and the earlier in the period it is identified, the less it costs to fix.
Related
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the Economic Substance Regulations?
Economic Substance Regulations — notification and, where a relevant activity is carried on, an annual report They require entities carrying on defined relevant activities to demonstrate genuine substance in the UAE — directed and managed here, with adequate people, premises and expenditure, and the core income-generating activities performed here.
What is a relevant activity?
A defined category: distribution and service centre, headquarters, holding company, intellectual property, lease-finance, shipping, banking, insurance and investment fund management. The definitions do not map neatly onto how businesses describe themselves, and licence activity descriptions are a poor guide.
Do holding companies need to file?
Holding shares can constitute a relevant activity, so quite possibly — and holding companies are exactly the entities nobody reviews. They do benefit from a reduced substance test, which is proportionate to what they actually do.
Should we file if we are not sure?
No. Filing defensively creates an ongoing obligation, an expectation of substance you may not have, and a stated position that is awkward to reverse. Do the determination properly once, document it, and revisit it when the activity changes.
What counts as adequate substance?
It is tested against the activity, so it varies. Board meetings physically held in the UAE with directors present and genuine decisions taken; qualified people here; premises proportionate to the activity; expenditure incurred in the UAE; and the core income-generating activities performed here rather than merely overseen.
Can we outsource to meet the substance test?
Outsourcing to a UAE provider can count, but it must be properly documented and the activity must actually be performed in the UAE under adequate supervision. An undocumented arrangement is substance you cannot demonstrate, which is the same as not having it.
When does the substance work need to happen?
During the period, not at filing. Board meetings cannot be held retrospectively and employment cannot be backdated. An entity that reviews its position at the start of the period can fix a deficiency; one that reviews at filing can only report it.
That determination drives everything else, and it is frequently got wrong in both directions. Send us your licences and what each entity actually does.
Check my compliance status 058 101 9570
Last reviewed 27 July 2026. Rates, thresholds and deadlines change — the e-invoicing provider deadline has already moved once. Confirm current requirements with the Federal Tax Authority before acting, or ask us to check your position.