The failures, and how they stack
| Failure | Assessed | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Late registration | Separately | AED 10,000, plus retroactive VAT liability on taxable supplies made since the threshold was crossed |
| Late return filing | Separately | Applies even where no tax was due |
| Late payment | Separately | 14% per annum on overdue tax since 14 April 2026 |
| Failure to keep records | Separately | AED 10,000 first offence, AED 20,000 for repeat (Cabinet Decision 129 of 2025) |
| Incorrect return | Separately | Reduced where voluntarily disclosed before discovery |
| All of the above | Cumulative | They do not merge into one |
The bottom row is the point. Businesses sometimes reason that since they are already late, one more failure changes little. It changes a great deal, each is assessed on its own terms, and the total is the sum rather than the largest.
The full position
The most useful thing to understand is that the penalty regime distinguishes between not doing something and doing it wrong, and it treats voluntary correction very differently from discovery.
A return filed late but correctly is one failure. A return filed on time but wrong is a different one. A return filed late and wrong is both.
And within the second category, an error you disclose before the FTA finds it is treated materially differently from the same error surfaced in an audit. That distinction is the single largest variable a business actually controls after the fact.
Which shapes the advice in a specific way. Once you know something is wrong, the clock that matters is not the original deadline. It is the gap between your knowing and your disclosing. Waiting does not preserve optionality; it removes the only advantage still available to you.
The April 2026 change, and why it matters
Cabinet Decision No. 129 of 2025 took effect on 14 April 2026 and replaced the previous compounding late-payment penalty with a flat 14% per annum on overdue tax on overdue tax.
That is a genuine structural change rather than a rate adjustment, and it has two consequences worth knowing:
- Old exposure calculations are wrong. Anything computed on monthly compounding overstates the position, sometimes substantially
- A great deal of published guidance has not been updated. Including on established firms’ websites: content that is not maintained does not announce that it has expired
- The urgency profile changed. Under compounding, delay escalated sharply; under a flat annual rate it accrues linearly. That is not a reason to delay, but it does mean panic-driven decisions are less justified than they were
- Fixed penalties are unaffected. Registration and filing penalties sit outside the rate and are not reduced by it
If somebody has quoted you an exposure figure and you are not sure which basis it used, that is worth asking. The difference between the two models on a long-overdue liability can be considerable.
What to do if you are already late
The sequence matters more than the speed, though both help.
File first, even if you cannot pay. Filing and payment are separate failures. Filing a return you cannot yet settle stops one of them accruing and is a materially better position than filing nothing.
Then quantify. Establish what is actually owed, on the current penalty basis rather than an old one.
Then look at what else is affected. A business late on one return is frequently late or wrong on others, and dealing with them together is both cheaper and better received than a sequence of separate corrections.
Then consider the routes. Voluntary disclosure where a filed return was wrong. Reconsideration where you believe a decision was incorrect, a tax period recorded wrongly, for instance. Waiver or instalment applications on the facts.
Each has its own deadline, and choosing the wrong route sometimes costs the chance to use the right one.
What actually helps an application
No outcome can be promised, and anyone promising one is overselling. But applications that succeed tend to share features:
The underlying non-compliance has already been corrected in full before the application was made. The timeline is documented rather than reconstructed. The circumstances are specific to the case rather than general assertions about difficulty. The compliance record before and since is otherwise clean. Any tax actually due has been paid rather than left outstanding alongside the penalty. And the application was made promptly rather than after a further period of silence.
What does not help: arguing the rules were unclear, blaming a former employee or adviser, or asserting the penalty is disproportionate in principle. Those may all be true and they are rarely persuasive.
The strongest single factor is the first. An application made from a position that is still non-compliant asks the authority to excuse an ongoing problem.
The common misunderstanding
- Assuming the failures merge. Registration, filing, payment and record-keeping are assessed separately and cumulatively.
- Not filing because you cannot pay. Filing stops one failure accruing; not filing adds another.
- Working from a compounding-based exposure figure, which has been out of date since 14 April 2026.
- Reasoning that one more late return changes little when you are already late.
- Waiting after discovering an error, which removes the only advantage you still control.
- Applying for relief before regularising, which is the commonest reason an application fails on its own terms.
- Choosing the wrong route and finding the right one time-barred.
What to do next
- File any outstanding return now, even if payment has to follow.
- Quantify on the current basis, not a compounding one.
- Check whether other periods are affected and deal with them together.
- Regularise before applying for any relief.
- Act on the disclosure route promptly once an error is known.
Related questions
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the penalty for filing a VAT return late?
Late filing is assessed as its own failure, separately from late registration and late payment. It applies even where no tax was due, which is why a nil return still needs to be filed on time.
Do the penalties combine into one?
No. They are cumulative. A business that registered late, filed late and paid late faces all three, assessed on their own terms. The total is the sum rather than the largest of them.
What is the late payment penalty now?
Cabinet Decision No. 129 of 2025 applies a flat 14% per annum on overdue tax on overdue tax from 14 April 2026, replacing the previous compounding model. Fixed registration and filing penalties sit outside that rate and are unaffected.
Our adviser quoted a large exposure figure. Is it right?
Check which basis it used. Figures calculated on the old monthly compounding model overstate the position, sometimes substantially, and a great deal of published guidance has never been updated since the April 2026 change.
Should we file if we cannot pay?
Yes, and promptly. Filing and payment are separate failures, so filing a return you cannot yet settle stops one of them accruing. Filing nothing adds a failure rather than deferring one.
Can a penalty be waived?
Reconsideration and waiver applications exist and are decided on their merits. Nobody can promise an outcome. What most affects an application is whether the underlying non-compliance was already corrected in full before it was made.
What helps an application succeed?
Regularising first, a documented rather than reconstructed timeline, circumstances specific to the case, an otherwise clean record, any tax actually due already paid, and acting promptly. Arguing that rules were unclear or blaming a former adviser rarely helps.
We found an error ourselves. Does that help?
Materially, yes, an error disclosed before the FTA identifies it is treated differently from the same error found in an audit. But the advantage decays with delay, so the gap between knowing and disclosing is the thing to minimise.
We are already late on one return. Does another matter?
Yes. Each period is its own failure, so the reasoning that you are already late and one more changes little is exactly backwards. Dealing with all affected periods together is both cheaper and better received than a sequence of separate corrections.
Filing and payment are separate failures. Stopping one from accruing is a materially better position than filing nothing, and it is the cheapest step available today.
Check my compliance status 058 101 9570
Last reviewed 27 July 2026. Rates, thresholds and deadlines change, the e-invoicing provider deadline has already moved once. Confirm current requirements with the Federal Tax Authority before acting, or ask us to check your position.